Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
premises |
|
Summary:
Construction of a recovery system carried out by QNS & Labrador Railway at Iron Ore. Lay-off to avoid problems during work stoppage at Iron Ore. Not work commonly carried on as separate in separate premises pursuant to 44(3).
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
directly interested |
contracting out |
|
Summary:
According to Umpire, insured was only indirectly interested, as he was employed by a subcontractor, even though subcontracting was one of the points in issue. Umpire erred in law, since the insured's situation was the same as in PELLETIER.