| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
partial resumption |
|
Summary:
Fact that a number of employees did not return to work immediately after settlement of dispute was directly related to that dispute; open to board to find that the stoppage was continuing, without committing error.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
attributable to dispute |
|
Summary:
The issue under 44(1)(a) is the time during which the employee contnued to be unemployed as a rsult of the work stoppage caused by the dispute. Another cause may arise and the point when the change occurs must be determined.
When the continuation of the work stoppage for the employee results solely from decisions of the employer, which are in no way imposed by the initial stoppage, although brought about by the strike or lock-out, the disentitlement terminates.
