Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
amount of penalty |
second offence |
|
Summary:
Penalty of $ 5589.00 for 23 false statements. Claimant erroneously notified of 1 false statement instead of 23. Umpire concluded that Commission had exceeded its authority and allowed the appeal rather than modifying the penalty amount. FCA concludes that Umpire failed to exercise his jurisdiction. Matter referred back to him or to the BOR to fix the penalty on the basis that the claimant made 1 false statement.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
penalties |
notice of decision |
|
Summary:
Penalty of $ 5589.00 for 23 false statements. Claimant erroneously notified of 1 false statement instead of 23. Umpire concluded that Commission had exceeded its authority and allowed the appeal rather than modifying the penalty amount. FCA concludes that Umpire failed to exercise his jurisdiction. Matter referred back to him or to the BOR to fix the penalty on the basis that the claimant made 1 false statement.