| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
7 days without earnings |
|
Summary:
3 months salary paid following permanent shutdown. Contract in force according to Board. The Umpire held a contrary view. Error in law. The parties to a contract of employment can legally agree to extend the contract for a period in which one will not be required to do any work.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
errors in law |
misinterpretation of facts |
|
Summary:
3 months salary paid following permanent shutdown. Contract in force according to Board. The Umpire held a contrary view. Error in law. The parties to a contract of employment can legally agree to extend the contract for a period in which one will not be required to do any work.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
capricious finding |
meaning |
Summary:
An Umpire may not review a finding of fact by a Board unless that finding was erroneous and made in a perverse or capricious manner. Clearly, even if the findings of fact may be questioned, it cannot be said that they are erroneous, not to mention perverse or capricious.
