| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
benevolent work |
|
|
Summary:
To avoid closure of the firm where the claimants had been working, they each contributed $10,000, and agreed to pay $18,182 over a 10-year period. Meanwhile, they had volunteered long hours of their time to attempt to save the business. It was determined that the claimants were not unemployed, because they worked full working weeks under section 43(1)(a) of the Regulations. Decision upheld [by] the Umpire. FCA agreed with the Umpire's decision and stated that the question to be answered in all these cases was whether the claimants had worked full working weeks. FCA found that, under the circumstances, the answer to this question remained the same, whether section 43 or 44 of the Regulations was applied.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
charter |
|
|
Summary:
To avoid closure of the firm where the claimants had been working, they each contributed $10,000, and agreed to pay $18,182 over a 10-year period. Meanwhile, they had volunteered long hours of their time to attempt to save the business. It was determined that the claimants were not unemployed, because they worked full working weeks under section 43(1)(a) of the Regulations. Decision upheld [by] the Umpire. FCA agreed with the Umpire's decision and stated that the question to be answered in all these cases was whether the claimants had worked full working weeks. FCA found that, under the circumstances, the answer to this question remained the same, whether section 43 or 44 of the Regulations was applied.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
shareholders |
|
|
Summary:
To avoid closure of the firm where the claimants had been working, they each contributed $10,000, and agreed to pay $18,182 over a 10-year period. Meanwhile, they had volunteered long hours of their time to attempt to save the business. It was determined that the claimants were not unemployed, because they worked full working weeks under section 43(1)(a) of the Regulations. Decision upheld [by] the Umpire. FCA agreed with the Umpire's decision and stated that the question to be answered in all these cases was whether the claimants had worked full working weeks. FCA found that, under the circumstances, the answer to this question remained the same, whether section 43 or 44 of the Regulations was applied.
