| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
reasonable period of time |
|
Summary:
The previous hearing referred to by the umpire is a warning that the Commission can, and in somes cases must, give a claimant that he must extend his job search if he wants to continue to satisfy the requirements of the legislation. Not a notice of the consequences of his unavailability once received.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
While the umpire can only confirm the Board's decision, he cannot simultaneously recognize that the claimant has a right to benefits because prior notice of the consequences of his disentitlement had not been given. Confirms the position of the FCA in Stolniuk (A-686-93).
