| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
errors in law |
|
|
Summary:
The Court found that the Umpire erred in law in interfering with the finding of the BOR. The Umpire could only intervene if the Board made a reviewable error based on an erroneous finding of fact that was made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material before it.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
compensatory leave |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant was disentitled because her time-off periods, every other week, were part of her work schedule. The Court determined that the claimant worked extra hours during the week and was not unemployed when she was off work due to a prearranged period of leave.
