Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
interruption of earnings |
compensatory leave |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant worked 59 hours every two weeks, and had one week off after each week of work. In addition, she received a bonus of $2.50 an hour for every hour worked in excess of 44 hours in a week. She and another employee worked «on a rotation basis». FCA held that the weeks off were provided for in the employment agreement as weeks of leave within the meaning of s. 10(4) of the Act, and consequently were not weeks of unemployment. **NOTE: Case A-76-95 (CUB 26683) is identical.