| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
right of appeal |
applicable delays |
|
Summary:
Assuming without deciding that the 21-day time limit was not complied with, we do not think that such non-compliance can operate so as to deprive the Umpire of jurisdiction to hear the appeal [brought within 60 days]. S. 87 is not before us to decide.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
ignorance of the law |
duty to enquire |
|
Summary:
The Umpire stated that, contrary to ALBRECHT, claimant made no effort to do what a reasonable person would do, namely contact the CEIC to find out if he qualified. ALBRECHT properly applied by Umpire to the factual situation.
