| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
proof required for entitlement |
|
|
Summary:
Because of strike, insured lost part-time job while he was claimant. Only vested rights: to claim benefits for a certain number of weeks. Entitlement is not a vested right because of 40(1). Case dismissed by FC without comment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
while claiming ui |
|
Summary:
Accepted a part-time job and continued to receive benefit until stopped working because of strike. No vested rights because of 40(1). Wrong to believe that only initial employment may disentitle claimant. Case dismissed by FC without comment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
legislative authority |
acquired rights |
|
Summary:
Because of strike, insured lost part-time job while he was claimant. Only vested rights: to claim benefits for a certain number of weeks. Entitlement is not a vested right because of 40(1). Case dismissed by FC without comment.
