| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
number of hours required |
violation |
|
Summary:
In his appeal to the Board of Referees, the claimant indicated that it is not fair that he is denied any benefits because he had accumulated 1,120 instead of 1,260 hours of employment between November 9, 2008 and October 31, 2009. The Commission established that the claimant was not a new entrant or re-entrant, and that as a result of one or more violations in the 260 weeks prior to making his claim for benefits, the Commission could and did invoke section 7.1(2) of the Act. The appeal by the claimant is dismissed by the Umpire.
