| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
pay raise denied |
|
Summary:
The claimant filed an initial claim for Employment Insurance with his ROE that indicated dismissed. He stated that he stopped reporting for work because he was not happy with his pay. When he was hired, he earned $13.00 an hour and now wants $14.00 and $15.00 an hour. His employer told him that raises were impossible on the work-sharing program and that he was not worth more than $13.00 an hour. The claimant was insulted and decided not to report for work anymore. The employer contacted him at home and told him that in June as he did every year, would review everyone’s’ pay. The claimant didn’t want to wait and didn’t return to work. The BOR’s decision is rescinded as the claimant had no just cause for quitting. The appeal by the commission is allowed by the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
working conditions |
unsatisfactory |
|
Summary:
The claimant filed an initial claim for Employment Insurance with his ROE that indicated dismissed. He stated that he stopped reporting for work because he was not happy with his pay. When he was hired, he earned $13.00 an hour and now wants $14.00 and $15.00 an hour. His employer told him that raises were impossible on the work-sharing program and that he was not worth more than $13.00 an hour. The claimant was insulted and decided not to report for work anymore. The employer contacted him at home and told him that in June as he did every year, would review everyone’s’ pay. The claimant didn’t want to wait and didn’t return to work. The BOR’s decision is rescinded as the claimant had no just cause for quitting. The appeal by the commission is allowed by the Umpire.
