| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
unexcused absences from work |
|
|
Summary:
According to the employer, the claimant was dismissed for unjustified absences and for reporting for work in a state of intoxication. He had received two written warnings in this regard and following the two warnings, the claimant reported for work in a state of intoxication on August 22, 2010. The claimant was dismissed on August 28, 2010. The Commission found that the claimant's actions constituted misconduct as to adversely affect the relationship of trust between himself and his employer. The claimant's appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
alcohol, drugs and gambling |
|
|
Summary:
According to the employer, the claimant was dismissed for unjustified absences and for reporting for work in a state of intoxication. He had received two written warnings in this regard and following the two warnings, the claimant reported for work in a state of intoxication on August 22, 2010. The claimant was dismissed on August 28, 2010. The Commission found that the claimant's actions constituted misconduct as to adversely affect the relationship of trust between himself and his employer. The claimant's appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
