Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
independent workers |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission's decided not to pay him E.I. benefits because the claimant was self-employed and could not be considered unemployed. The claimant stated that he was spending all his time on his business, rather than looking for other work. He was the sole owner and had no one to help him. He spent more than 12 hours a day on his business. The claimant’s appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
Not available and not otherwise available |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission's decided not to pay him E.I. benefits because the claimant was self-employed and could not be considered unemployed. The claimant stated that he was spending all his time on his business, rather than looking for other work. He was the sole owner and had no one to help him. He spent more than 12 hours a day on his business. The claimant’s appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
various activities |
setting up a business |
|
Summary:
The Commission's decided not to pay him E.I. benefits because the claimant was self-employed and could not be considered unemployed. The claimant stated that he was spending all his time on his business, rather than looking for other work. He was the sole owner and had no one to help him. He spent more than 12 hours a day on his business. The claimant’s appeal is dismissed by the Umpire.