| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
unacceptable behavior |
sexual assault |
|
Summary:
The claimant, a security guard, was dismissed according to his employer because he was accused of sexual harassment while the claimant claims his dismissal was due to disagreement with his employer concerning wage reductions. The Commission refused to pay the claimant benefits since it concluded that he had been dismissed due to his misconduct. The appeal before the Umpire is dismissed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
misconduct |
acts of violence |
|
Summary:
The claimant, a security guard, was dismissed according to his employer because he was accused of sexual harassment while the claimant claims his dismissal was due to disagreement with his employer concerning wage reductions. The Commission refused to pay the claimant benefits since it concluded that he had been dismissed due to his misconduct. The appeal before the Umpire is dismissed.
