| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
own misconduct |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant lost his employment by reason of his own misconduct. The claimant was in treatment for a gambling addiction and was therefore rehired by the employer on the condition that he not borrow money from co-workers. The Employer confirmed the claimant was a great worker but his gambling problem distracted him from his work. He was told that he would be fired if he asked other employees for money and the claimant agreed not to do so. The claimant visited an employee's home seeking a loan; he was dismissed the next day. The appeal by the claimant was dismissed by the Umpire
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
alcohol, drugs and gambling |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant lost his employment by reason of his own misconduct. The claimant was in treatment for a gambling addiction and was therefore rehired by the employer on the condition that he not borrow money from co-workers. The Employer confirmed the claimant was a great worker but his gambling problem distracted him from his work. He was told that he would be fired if he asked other employees for money and the claimant agreed not to do so. The claimant visited an employee's home seeking a loan; he was dismissed the next day. The appeal by the claimant was dismissed by the Umpire
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
loss of employment |
definition |
|
Summary:
The claimant lost his employment by reason of his own misconduct. The claimant was in treatment for a gambling addiction and was therefore rehired by the employer on the condition that he not borrow money from co-workers. The Employer confirmed the claimant was a great worker but his gambling problem distracted him from his work. He was told that he would be fired if he asked other employees for money and the claimant agreed not to do so. The claimant visited an employee's home seeking a loan; he was dismissed the next day. The appeal by the claimant was dismissed by the Umpire
