Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
misconduct |
breaches of company policy |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant was refused employment insurance benefits on the grounds that he lost his employment due to his own misconduct. The claimant was employed as a casino floor manager. He was not satisfied with the operation of the surveillance cameras and he mentioned this in the presence of staff and a guest. The camera tapes were refused by the employer, and so were the files relative to the incidents held against him when he was dismissed. The issue was not the accuracy of the cameras, but the conduct of the claimant and his discussion in front of staff and patrons; and the breach of a confidentiality agreement. The appeal by the claimant was dismissed by the Umpire.