Decision 65854
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 65854 | Goulard G. | English | 2006-08-09 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | Commission | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | loss of employment | casual employees |
Summary:
Claimant was a casual on-call employee member of the union. He argued that his loss of employment was due to the fact that he was not recalled to work rather than prevented from working due to the strike. Claimant fell within the provisions of Regulation 36(1) as he was scheduled to work and would have worked had it not been for the strike.