Decision 61718B
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 61718B | Gobeil | French | 2005-09-14 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| interruption of earnings | conditions required | non-monetary income |
Summary:
The umpire stated that the use of a company truck and cellular phone constitutes a benefit equivalent to remuneration. He confirmed the Board of Referee's decision and concluded that the claimant did not have an interruption of earnings under the Act.