Decision 61718B
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 61718B | Gobeil | French | 2005-09-14 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | Claimant | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
interruption of earnings | conditions required | non-monetary income |
Summary:
The umpire stated that the use of a company truck and cellular phone constitutes a benefit equivalent to remuneration. He confirmed the Board of Referee's decision and concluded that the claimant did not have an interruption of earnings under the Act.