| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
by reason of a stoppage |
|
Summary:
Claimant stopped working due to a labour dispute. Facts established that he was a member of the Union representing his bargaining unit. Claimant failed to demonstrate that he fell within the exclusions provided in the Act i.e. that he was not participating in the labour dispute, he was not financing the work stoppage and that he was not directly interested in the result of the labour dispute leading to the work stoppage.
