Decision 55245
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 55245 | Salhany | English | 2002-10-23 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Allowed | No | Claimant | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
penalties | amount of penalty | mitigating circumstances |
Summary:
It is not enough for the agent to say that the Commission took into account all relevant factors and did not take into account all irrelevant factors. What appears apparent is that the agent adopted the usual practice of imposing an automatic 100% penalty for a first offence. This is not a reason that meets judicial standards: it is an arbitrary decision.