| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
in the future |
|
Summary:
The claimant had to pay union dues, even while on probation. He did not receive strike pay from his union. He was directly interested in the results of the bargaining since he obtained permanent status and received monetary and other benefits included in the new collective agreement. Failed to prove that he was not participating in, financing or directly interested in the labour dispute.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
temporary, probationary |
|
Summary:
The claimant had to pay union dues, even while on probation. He did not receive strike pay from his union. He was directly interested in the results of the bargaining since he obtained permanent status and received monetary and other benefits included in the new collective agreement. Failed to prove that he was not participating in, financing or directly interested in the labour dispute.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
labour dispute |
financing |
|
Summary:
The claimant had to pay union dues, even while on probation. He did not receive strike pay from his union. He was directly interested in the results of the bargaining since he obtained permanent status and received monetary and other benefits included in the new collective agreement. Failed to prove that he was not participating in, financing or directly interested in the labour dispute.
