| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
to accompany spouse |
|
Summary:
Claimant left job in April 98 in order to move to live with her fiancé. They planned to marry in December 98. She had been commuting on weekends and holidays for over 11 months. The BOR found that claimant meets the definition of common-law relationship and that the VL was justified. The Umpire refused to interfere. The Commission did not appeal the case to the FCA since the notion of "no other reasonable alternative" was not covered.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
just cause |
marriage and move |
|
Summary:
Claimant left job in April 98 in order to move to live with her fiancé. They planned to marry in December 98. She had been commuting on weekends and holidays for over 11 months. The BOR found that claimant meets the definition of common-law relationship and that the VL was justified. The Umpire refused to interfere. The Commission did not appeal the case to the FCA since the notion of "no other reasonable alternative" was not covered.
