| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
legislation |
rationale |
|
Summary:
Claimant left his job to attend technical school to further his education and to enhance the possibility of him receiving a better job. There is abundant jurisprudence which indicates that a person cannot leave a position to return to school and receive benefits, unless this is a course which receives the approval fo the Commission which was not the case here.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
personal reasons |
courses of study |
|
Summary:
Claimant left his job to attend technical school to further his education and to enhance the possibility of him receiving a better job. There is abundant jurisprudence which indicates that a person cannot leave a position to return to school and receive benefits, unless this is a course which receives the approval fo the Commission which was not the case here.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
courses |
purpose of the legislation |
|
Summary:
Claimant took a course of instruction to which he was not directed by the Commission. Umpire stated that the EI Act is not designed to pay students for their expenses while attending school. It is only for those who are genuinely unemployed to provide them with money to tide them over until they find employment.
