| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
conditions required for exemption |
|
|
Summary:
BOR deemed that the clmt, who is a member of an international union, had no interest in the labour dispute because he belonged to the industrial sector and only the residential sector was subject to the decree. Umpire found that BOR erred in failing to apply the conditions of the Act. Clmt was directly interested in the dispute since he belonged to the union and financed it through his own contributions.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
directly interested |
|
|
Summary:
BOR deemed that the clmt, who is a member of an international union, had no interest in the labour dispute because he belonged to the industrial sector and only the residential sector was subject to the decree. Umpire found that BOR erred in failing to apply the conditions of the Act. Clmt was directly interested in the dispute since he belonged to the union and financed it through his own contributions.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
financing |
|
|
Summary:
BOR deemed that the clmt, who is a member of an international union, had no interest in the labour dispute because he belonged to the industrial sector and only the residential sector was subject to the decree. Umpire found that BOR erred in failing to apply the conditions of the Act. Clmt was directly interested in the dispute since he belonged to the union and financed it through his own contributions.
