Decision 38944
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 38944 | Reed | English | 1997-10-27 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | rationale |
Summary:
The legislators reasoned that if an individual received, on termination, a significant amount in the way of severance pay or vacation pay, that individual did not need the same amount of tiding-over as those who were not in receipt of such amounts.