Decision 38453
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 38453 | Marin | English | 1997-09-04 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | Claimant | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | income | definition |
Summary:
Umpire could not conclude that income, as defined in Reg. 57(1), includes tounament prizes that a curler might receive. Umpire noted that the definition of income states, "from an employer or any other person". The "or", in his view, cannot be constructed as avoiding an employer/employee relationship.