| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
availability for work |
|
|
Summary:
Held that the Board erred in law, that it confused the concepts of unemployment and availability, that the claimant was not unemployed in regards with his business to which he devoted 40 hours a week at the time when he was employed elsewhere 60 hours per week.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
business |
|
|
Summary:
Held that the Board erred in law, that it confused the concepts of unemployment and availability, that the claimant was not unemployed in regards with his business to which he devoted 40 hours a week at the time when he was employed elsewhere 60 hours per week.
