| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
workforce reduction |
|
Summary:
Claimant's further submission is that she was advised, upon inquiry, before she resigned that she would be eligible for UI. That will not assist her having regard to all the provisions of reg. 56.1 and the evidence in relation thereto. She said she alsorelied on a book distributed by CEIC on UI.
No evidence that the co-worker in surplus status would have been terminated had claimant not resigned. Weight of evidence to the contrary. The co-worker continued to be employed, although in surplus for 2½ years, and was moved from surplus into a position vacated by claimant's resignation.
