Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
benevolent work |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant's relations with his former employer were voluntary in nature. He received no remuneration, and his pathetic hope of keeping the business alive for some imaginary prospective buyer who could hire him was far removed from a genuinely objective expectation.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
knowingly |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant, by his statement "I see now that I was wrong in not disclosing my activity", is plainly not confessing to have "knowingly" made false statements. He is saying that he made an error in law, not that he knowingly deceived.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
work without remuneration |
|
|
Summary:
It seems that large numbers of claimants understand the question: "Did you work?" to mean with pay or other remuneration. This question should be modified to include the notion "with or without pay", or "whether as a volunteer or not", or some such.