Decision 25241A

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 25241A   Urie  English 1994-12-22
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
earnings  income  in kind 

Summary:

During her employment claimant had the use of an employer-owned vehicle. Would have returned the vehicle when on maternity leave had she known this is income. Income includes non-pecuniary income and the entire income must be deducted. The non-pecuniary benefit must be allocated under s. 58.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  jurisdiction  guidelines from the Commission 

Summary:

It is true that the form of Application for UI Benefits is deficient when it asks the question "Did you or will you get any other monies from your last employer". But it is not the form which governs. It is the requirements of the Act and its Regulations which must prevail over the form.


Date modified: