Decision 22996
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22996 | MacKay | English | 1993-10-01 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | directly interested | employment terminates |
Summary:
Jurisprudence makes clear that merely receiving an increase in wages after a strike does not mean that a non-union worker is directly interested in a labour dispute when the increase is completely within the discretion of the employer and there is no continuing right of the employee to employment.