Decision 22700
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 22700 | Walsh | English | 1993-07-06 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | just cause | to accompany spouse |
Summary:
The Board allowed the appeal. This is clearly wrong in law. It is the UI Act which had to be dealt with and if Parliament had intended to include common-law relationships in ss. 28(4) it would have done so. Instead, it clearly refers to "a spouse".