Decision 22269

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 22269   Cullen  English 1993-01-18
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate  misinformation from third party 

Summary:

She conceded that her knowledge about the Act came from a secretary in the office. She never made enquiries of the Commission. Also, she knew UI premiums were being deducted from her commission cheques. A reasonable person would likely have asked: "If Ican't collect UI, why am I paying premiums?"


Date modified: