Decision 22269
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 22269 | Cullen | English | 1993-01-18 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
antedate | misinformation from third party |
Summary:
She conceded that her knowledge about the Act came from a secretary in the office. She never made enquiries of the Commission. Also, she knew UI premiums were being deducted from her commission cheques. A reasonable person would likely have asked: "If Ican't collect UI, why am I paying premiums?"