| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
co-adventure |
|
|
Summary:
Store managed by husband who has most of the shares. Claimant devotes over 30 hours a week to it. She must be considered as engaged in a co-adventure. The fact that she held only 1% of the shares is not determinative. Family enterprise. She would profitdirectly or indirectly.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
business of a spouse |
|
|
Summary:
I need only ask the question "Would she have done this much work week after week, without pay, for a friend or a total stranger?" Obviously she would not have contributed this sort of effort to an enterprise in which she had no financial or family interest.
Store managed by husband who has most of the shares. Claimant devotes over 30 hours a week to it. She must be considered as engaged in a co-adventure. The fact that she held only 1% of the shares is not determinative. Family enterprise. She would profitdirectly or indirectly.
