Decision 21936

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 21936   Reed  English 1992-10-15
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
week of unemployment  minor in extent 


He did spend considerable time at his wife's bistro. He was doing so however on a voluntary basis and out of boredom. He did not have enough to do to occupy his time. Not locked into working regular hours. His wife could increase her hours. It was a one-person business.

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  proof  need for an explanation  weight 


It is clear that claimant made statements which were false but I conclude that he did not do so knowingly. He gave an entirely credible explanation: he did not think that helping his wife out and receiving no wages was working.

Date modified: