Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Summary:
He did spend considerable time at his wife's bistro. He was doing so however on a voluntary basis and out of boredom. He did not have enough to do to occupy his time. Not locked into working regular hours. His wife could increase her hours. It was a one-person business.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
penalties |
proof |
need for an explanation |
weight |
Summary:
It is clear that claimant made statements which were false but I conclude that he did not do so knowingly. He gave an entirely credible explanation: he did not think that helping his wife out and receiving no wages was working.