Decision 20628
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20628 | McNair | English | 1991-11-25 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returned to a different Board | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| voluntarily leaving employment | working conditions | dangerous |
Summary:
The Board should have applied the prescribed test of whether what claimant did in the circumstances with which he was confronted was what a reasonably prudent person in similar circumstances would have done, that is, quit the employment which he felt was endangering his health.