Decision 20308
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 20308 | Joyal | English | 1991-08-29 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| week of unemployment | co-adventure |
Summary:
Claimant argued that he was only 1/3 shareholder. The issue of company ownership is irrelevant. One can be engaged in a co-adventure within reg. 43(1)(a) without being legally connected to the business, as stated in TREMBLAY. He clearly had an interest in the family business.