Decision 19766
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 19766 | Joyal | English | 1991-06-05 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | interruption of earnings | layoff or separation | definition |
|---|
Summary:
In the context of the Act, a suspension without pay is equivalent to a loss of employment or a separation from employment. As a result, monies received as settlement must be allocated from the week of separation (suspension without pay) rather than fromfinal termination. [p._9]
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | earnings | allocation | from week of layoff |
|---|
Summary:
In the context of the Act, a suspension without pay is equivalent to a loss of employment or a separation from employment. As a result, monies received as settlement must be allocated from the week of separation (suspension without pay) rather than fromfinal termination. [p._9]
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: | earnings | awards | allocation |
|---|
Summary:
In the context of the Act, a suspension without pay is equivalent to a loss of employment or a separation from employment. As a result, monies received as settlement must be allocated from the week of separation (suspension without pay) rather than fromfinal termination. [p._9]