| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
transfer |
|
Summary:
Claimant left upon being forced to accept a transfer and being unable to claim family moving expenses because the Armed Forces did not recognize common-law relationships for that purpose. The employment contract made it clear that relocation was a requirement of the employment, said the Board.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| voluntarily leaving employment |
applicability |
armed forces |
|
Summary:
Claimant left upon being forced to accept a transfer and being unable to claim family moving expenses because the Armed Forces did not recognize common-law relationships for that purpose. The employment contract made it clear that relocation was a requirement of the employment, said the Board.
