Decision 19326

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 19326   Reed  English 1991-04-10
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
week of unemployment  rationale 

Summary:

There is no doubt that Reg. 43 is, in part, directed to individuals who quit their employment in order to start their own business. The subsidization of the start up period for a small business is not part of the objectives of the UI scheme.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  rules of construction  intent and object 

Summary:

It is not open to an Umpire to ignore the clear wording of a statute. If the provision is unclear then it will be interpreted in accordance with the principles and objectives but, where there is no ambiguity in the wording, these cannot be used to rewrite the clear wording.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  legislative authority  purpose of ui system 

Summary:

Benefits are intended to be paid as insurance to people between jobs when they have lost employment with one employer and are seeking employment with another.


Date modified: