Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
directly interested |
temporary, probationary |
|
Summary:
Although the claimant was not in the union, he was a probationary employee and his position was within the bargaining unit which the union had authority to represent. This difference clearly distinguishes his situation from that of COLE. [p._7]
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
loss of employment |
terminates during strike |
|
Summary:
I would agree with CUB 16581 that it must be clear he has ended his employer relationship and would not return. Further, it is he who bears the burden of proving the date his employment has terminated irrespective of the outcome of the dispute and thus has no interest. [p._10]