Decision 18138
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 18138 | Strayer | English | 1990-06-22 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Returned to a different Board | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| availability for work | restrictions | reasonable period of time |
Summary:
I do not disagree in principle that there can be situations where the employment possibilities are patently non-existent and a claimant cannot claim UI for any period because he has by his move made himself unavailable. However it has not been shown that this is the case here.