Decision 17586
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 17586 | Martin | English | 1990-01-10 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| board of referees | legislative authority | purpose of ui system |
Summary:
Contributions alone are not sufficient to entitle one to UI. The UI fund is not a type of banking arrangement whereby claimants pay premiums into it and then when they are no longer working they are entitled to draw on the fund.