| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
type of work |
|
Summary:
It is true that "unduly restrictive" is not defined in the Act but the jurisprudence clearly shows that, while one is entitled to restrict the type of work for some time, she may not do so indefinitely. If she exceeds a reasonable period, her restriction will become an undue one.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
Claimant argues to have been told only that her restriction "might" affect her claim when she should have been told that it "would". This has no merit. It is clear she was warned on 2 occasions and that she persisted in the same conduct. The warnings could not have been clearer.
