| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| sickness benefits |
out of canada |
|
|
Summary:
No one can argue that a stay in a tropical climate (Venezuela) in a tourist establishment even though authorized by a doctor could be the equivalent of "like facility" referred to in Reg. 54(3).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
errors by Commission |
not a ground of entitlement |
|
Summary:
Now taken for granted since GRANGER that erroneous information that might be given to the claimant by CEIC officials concerning the interpretation of the legislation on that claimant's specific situation and that are later detrimental to same claimant are not binding on CEIC.
