Decision 17394A

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 17394A   MacKay  English 1990-10-30
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -

Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
interruption of earnings  compensatory leave 


Providing unemployment insurance to an employee engaged in a work schedule which might be thought of as banking weekends would amount to a form of double indemnity not available to other workers engaged full-time in more regularly scheduled employment. It may be that the leave provision arose so that more union members could obtain work. Nevertheless, where the entitlement to leave arises for the reason that one regularly works long hours with little time off, 10(4) is applicable even though the leaveserves as job-sharing.

Date modified: