Decision 16993
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16993 | MacKay | English | 1989-09-18 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic concepts | eligibility to benefits |
Summary:
As to claimant's contention that she should be entitled to UI having paid into the system, I would merely point out that payment of UI is not contingent only upon payment into the scheme but also upon fulfillment of certain conditions in the Act including proof of availability.