Decision 16974

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 16974   Jerome  English 1989-09-13
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  courses  presumption 

Summary:

A presumption arises and may be rebutted by evidence showing that obtaining work is the prime concern and the interest in the course is only secondary. The most convincing proof consists of an intensive and continuous job search. UI not intended to subsidize education.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  legislative authority  purpose of ui system 

Summary:

As Umpires have said time and time again, UI benefits are for those who through no action on their part find themselves without work and who, in spite of continuous and intensive efforts to find work, cannot do so.


Date modified: