Decision 16809
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16809 | Denault | English | 1989-07-18 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| interruption of earnings | compensatory leave |
Summary:
Claimant employed 60 to 70 hours and 7 days per week every other week. In view of the clear statements both by the employer and the employee that a worksharing pattern had been put forward by the employer, this called for a clear application of reg. 42(4).